Greenspace logo
Welcome
Climate
  • Home
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • ยป
    Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs

Client Login

Legal Register - Climate

Environmental
  • Select Month:
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
Preview Email
September 2023
Congratulations. There are no changes to the legislation or other requirements in your legal register.
 
Recent Publications

New publications this month:

HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE

Musculoskeletal Disorders and Whole-Body Vibration From Driving: Manage the Risk to Your Workforce

This hour-long webinar was run in September. It is now available for free online.

 

Manage a building control application for a higher-risk building (England)

This service may be used to apply for higher-risk building work or work to an existing higher-risk building. Higher-risk buildings are those that have at least seven storeys or are at least 18 metres in height and are either have at least two residential units or is a hospital or care home.

As a result of the Building Safety Act 2022, the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) is now responsible for building control in relation to higher-risk buildings. Local authorities are no longer responsible.

 

New and updated guidance on the higher-risk building regime

A range of guidance supporting the Building Safety Act 2022 has been published for the first time or updated, as follows:

  • Giving BSR structure and fire safety information (key building information): updated, now covers the questions the BSR will ask.
  • Building safety guides for accountable persons: new, provides guidance on building safety risk assessments, managing risks and safety management systems.
  • Safety case for a high-rise residential building: new, provides guidance on responsibilities of accountable persons for the higher-risk building’s safety case.
  • Preparing a safety case report: new, provides details of the principal accountable persons duties regarding building safety case reports for higher-risk buildings.
  • Safety in high-rise residential buildings: Accountable persons: updated, now links to other applicable guidance.
  • Preparing a resident engagement strategy: updated to improve explanations of requirements.
  • Reporting a mandatory occurrence: new, provides guidance on which building safety occurrences must be reported to the BSR and how reports must be made.
  • Contact the Building Safety Regulator: new, allows anyone in England to contact the BSR to ask questions.

 

Safety Notices

The HSE published two safety notices in September 2023:

  • Motorsport/Leisure Track Safety: trackside vehicle restraint barriers
  • Manage risk of damage to grating systems (walkways and deck areas) on offshore installations during rig moves

 

 

MARITIME AND COASTGUARD AGENCY (MCA)

The following Marine Guidance Notes relevant to occupational health and safety were published or updated during September 2023:

  • MGN 635 (M): Inspections of Ro-Ro passenger ships and high-speed passenger craft
  • MGN 664 (M+F) Amendment 1: Certification process for vessels using innovative technology
  • MGN 673 (M+F): Radio communications: non-SOLAS vessel
 
Offences

Company receives £1.275m fine after a man was crushed to death at their quarry

Tarmac Aggregates Ltd has received a seven-figure after a man was crushed to death during maintenance work at Mountsorrel Quarry in Leicestershire.

The man died in the early hours of 21 June 2017 after becoming trapped between a conveyor and a feed hopper.

The contractor, who was working on behalf of Branston Site Services Limited, was part of a nightshift maintenance team that was repairing a feed hopper at the quarry, operated by Tarmac Aggregates Limited. The man had been stood on a conveyor that was located under the feed hopper and had not been effectively isolated before the repair work started. The conveyor was inadvertently switched on, trapping the worker against the feed hopper, fatally crushing him.

An HSE investigation into this incident found that Tarmac Aggregates Limited had failed to ensure the feed hopper was properly isolated before the repair work commenced. The test button on the conveyor electrical panel was not connected to the test circuit and was therefore inoperative. This issue appears to have existed for many years before the incident, meaning that Tarmac Aggregates Limited failed to ensure critical defects were recorded and rectified in a timely manner. The company should have also provided a visual and audible pre-start alarm for the conveyor.

Breaches

Tarmac Aggregates Limited pleaded guilty to breaching pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) and Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974:

  • Section 2(1) requires employers to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of their employees.
  • Section 3(1) requires that employers ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that persons they do not employ who may be affected are not exposed to risks to their health and safety

Penalty

Tarmac Aggregates Limited was fined £1,275,000 and ordered to pay £200,000 in costs.

 

 

Catering and retail butcher company fined after a worker severed fingers

A Herefordshire meat company has been fined after a teenage worker severed three fingers and partially a fourth while operating machinery that wasn’t suitably guarded.

On 18 July 2020, the 18-year-old man was operating a grinding machine at LDA Meats Limited in Ledbury. While he was mincing some lamb, the worker slipped on the wet floor and, in an attempt to save himself, put his hand out and into the machine.  This caused him to sever his fingers when his hand came into contact with the rotating worm thread in the machine.

An HSE investigation found the machine had not been suitably and sufficiently assessed to identify the hazardous parts, the risks associated with the machine or the required control measures to prevent access to dangerous parts.

The HSE investigation also found the machine was not subject to routine guard checks. This meant an issue with the safety cut out device within the lid of the machine had not been detected or remedied. It was possible for the machine to be operated with the lid open, providing access to dangerous rotating parts.

Breach

LDA Meats Limited pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regs 1998:

  • Regulation 11(1) requires employers to ensure measures are taken to prevent access to dangerous parts of machinery or any rotating stock-bar, or to stop the movement of any dangerous part of machinery or rotating stock-bar before any part of a person enters at danger zone.

Penalty

LDA Meats Limited was fined £8,000 and ordered to pay costs of £2,339.80.

 

 

Chemical supplier fined after driver suffered chemical burns

A company in Lincolnshire has received a six-figure fine after a driver suffered chemical burns to his feet.

On 9 August 2022, the driver had been offloading his tanker during a delivery at Tronox Pigment UK Limited’s premises in Stallingborough, Grimsby. During the offloading process, the man was standing in what he assumed to be a puddle of rainwater, due to the fact it had been raining throughout the day and the drains were blocked. However, the driver was actually standing in a pool of water containing a corrosive caustic chemical.

The man suffered chemical burns leading to him requiring skin grafts to the underside of both feet. The smallest toe on each of his feet were also amputated. The driver was unable to work for 12 weeks.

The pool of chemicals had leaked from the company’s scrubber system and secondary containment. It ended up on the roadway after the site’s sump pumps failed to pump the chemicals away.

An HSE  investigation found that Tronox Pigment UK Limited had not responded adequately to control the risk of a loss of containment after the site’s sump pumps failed to work. The firm’s failure to ensure the drains were kept clear also meant drivers did not recognise pools of standing liquid as a potential risk.

Breach

Tronox Pigment UK Limited pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) and Section 33(1)(a) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974:

  • Section 33(1)(a) makes it an offence for a person to fail to discharge any duty under Sections 2 through 7 of the Act.

Penalty

Tronox Pigment UK Limited was fined £200,000 and ordered to pay £7,500 in costs.

 

 

Waterman Greenspace