Greenspace logo
Welcome
Climate
  • Home
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • ยป
    Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs

Client Login

Climate - Legal Register

Environmental
  • Select Month:
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
Preview Email
August 2025
Congratulations. There are no changes to the legislation or other requirements in your legal register.
 
Recent Publications

New publications this month:

HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE (HSE)

PIC: Export and import of hazardous chemicals

The HSE is inviting companies to submit Prior Informed Consent (PIC) notifications for exports of chemicals on the Great British PIC list that are anticipated to take place during 2026. Notifications under the PIC regime require the first export to be notified to the HSE at least 35 days before the intended date of any exports.

 

Work Right Campaigns

The HSE has launched its redesigned work right campaign website.

 

Safety Notice: Motion Compensated Gangways Auto-retraction

This notice is targeted towards offshore installation duty holders, offshore vessel owners and operators, windfarm operators and associated principal contractors and contractors.

This safety notice concerns incidents where a failure or error of a motion compensated gangway (MCG) power or control system has resulted in the gangway retracting without warning.

Operators, duty holders and vessel owners or operators should ensure that any gangway auto-retraction function provides suitable audible and visible warnings which allow users sufficient time to make themselves safe before the auto-retraction function activates.

 

Safety Notice: Excavators: Use of safety control lever or isolation devices

This notice is targeted towards excavator operators, slingers and anyone working near them.

There is a risk that people can be struck by the excavator or a load if the excavator operator does not use the safety control lever or isolation device correctly.

Duty holders must, so far as reasonably practicable, ensure the safety of persons in the working arc of slewing plant and also any load, with the proper planning, management and monitoring of work activities.

 

MINISTRY OF HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOME OFFICE

Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022: fire doors

Routine checks of fire doors are required in buildings that contain two or more sets of domestic premises and are above 11 metres in height.

Guidance on undertaking routine checks of fire doors has been updated. The Fire doors checklist has also been updated.

 

MARITIME AND COASTGUARD AGENCY (MCA)

The following notes and notices relevant to occupational health and safety were published or updated during August 2025:

  • MGN 436 (M+F) Amendment 5 whole body vibration
  • MGN 559 (M+F) Amendment 2 Electromagnetic fields regulations 2016
  • MGN 568 (M) Amendment 1 Surveys: alternative compliance safety system
  • MGN 591 (M+F) Amendment 3 provision of safe means of access
  • MGN 672 (M) Extended dry-docking
  • MIN 681 (M) Amendment 1: Helicopter aviation inspection bodies
  • MSN 1905 (M+F) Amendment 4: Ships’ Medical Stores

 

EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY (ECHA): EU AND NORTHERN IRELAND

ECHA publishes updated PFAS restriction proposal

An updated proposal to restrict PFAS has been published. This expands the assessments to further sectors and includes the consideration of additional alternatives to restriction.

ECHA has also confirmed that it aims to complete the scientific evaluation of the proposed EU-wide restriction on PFAS will be completed by the end of 2026.

 
Offences

Worker burns lead to fine for chemical company

A rendering plant operator has received a six-figure fine after an employee was burnt by steam at its Motherwell premises.

The company operates a large rendering plant that processes animal waste and food industry waste to produce proteins, fats and oils used in the oleo chemical, fuel, and feed industries. As a result of this process, the water tank and vickery need occasional cleaning.

During the nightshift on 23 October 2019, a worker had been instructed to clean the process water tank, the vickery and the walls and floors in that area. The company provided pressure washers as well as a steam hose for cleaning down difficult areas where there may be tallow or other animal residues.

The steam hose provided for use was heavy and cumbersome to manoeuvre, with the uninsulated nozzle also becoming hot. The worker and a colleague therefore took it in turns to carry out the steam hose task. After a period of time, they stopped to have a break. While the worker’s colleague then went on to carry out other duties, the man proceeded to finish the cleaning on his own using a small cherry picker, attaching the steam hose to its basket.

After the basket had been raised to the required height, the steam hose and nozzle spun round and steam began flowing into the cherry picker basket directly at the worker. He quickly turned his back to prevent his face being burned, while manipulating the nozzle of the hose away from him and lowering the basket of the cherry picker, at which point he was then able to run through to one of the deluge showers to cool his burn injuries. He was taken to hospital with steam burns to several parts of his body, which have left scars to this day.

An HSE investigation found the nozzle fitted to the steam hose was unsafe as it did not have a trigger or other mechanism fitted to allow the operator to start or stop the flow out of the nozzle at the point of operation. It also found that the mixing valve and set-up for supplying hot water for cleaning purposes was not maintained in an efficient working order or in good repair. Supervisors were aware that the mixing valve was passing steam, however no action was taken to investigate the issue or prevent it from happening.

HSE inspectors also found the maintenance and engineering team had no sound engineering understanding of the risks involved when setting up such a washdown system and how to mitigate or control those risks. The company provided information to HSE that there were no records associated with the maintenance of the valve, hose or nozzle.

Breach

Dundas Chemical Company (Mosspark) Limited pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) to the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974:

  • Section 2(1) applies a duty on every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all employees.

Fine

Dundas Chemical Company (Mosspark) Limited was fined £100,000.

 

Sole trader fined after a worker fell from height

A sole trader has been fined after a worker fell from a flat roof without any edge protection. This was the second time the sole trader had failed to provide edge protection on a job, with the HSE previously taking enforcement action against him.

On 15 December 2022, a team of roofers and labourers were working on the sole trader’s behalf, replacing a flat roof on a house in the Luton area. At around 11am, one of the workers was carrying large wooden boards across the roof, when he inadvertently stepped off the edge of the roof falling a distance of about 10 feet. He suffered a fractured vertebrate in his back and a broken ankle.

The HSE investigation found the task had not been properly risk assessed and planned, which meant that edge protection around the flat roof had not been put in place, despite it being reasonably practicable to do so. Following HSE intervention, edge protection was installed before work re-commenced.

Breach

The sole trader pleaded guilty to a breach of Regulation 4(1) of the Work At Height Regulations 2005:

  • Regulation 4(1) requires employers to ensure work at height is property planned, appropriately supervised and carried out in a manner which is so far as is reasonably practicable safe. Planning is required to include the selection of work equipment in accordance with Regulation 7.

Penalty

The sole trader was fined £2,125 and ordered to pay costs of £5,445.

 

Construction company fined after workers were exposed to asbestos

A Manchester-based construction company has been fined after workers were placed at risk of exposure to asbestos. A1 Property Maintenance Management Limited was acting as the principal contractor during work at the former Unicorn Public House in Eccles, Greater Manchester.

During a routine HSE inspection to the site on 16 May 2022, an HSE inspector discovered that 12 square metres of Asbestos Insulating Board (AIB) had been present in a dumb waiter lift shaft but had already been illegally removed by unknown individuals.  The inspector issued a prohibition notice, stopping all work until an asbestos survey had been completed.

Previously, after noticing the pub door had been broken into, a site worker had entered the building, where they discovered what appeared to be asbestos debris in the area around the lift shaft. The debris was later wrapped and removed by a licensed asbestos removal contractor. However, A1 Property Maintenance Management Limited failed to carry out a full asbestos survey to confirm that all asbestos-containing materials had been removed before allowing further construction work.

Breach

A1 Property Maintenance Management Limited pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 4(6) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012:

  • Regulation 4(6) requires dutyholders to review assessments of whether asbestos is or is liable to be present where:
    • there is reason to suspect that the assessment is no longer valid; or
    • there has been a significant change in the premises to which the assessment relates.

Penalty

A1 Property Maintenance Management Limited was fined £5,360 and ordered to pay £5,117 in costs.

Waterman Greenspace