Greenspace logo
Welcome
Climate
  • Home
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • ยป
    Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs

Client Login

Legal Register - Climate

Environmental
  • Select Month:
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
Preview Email
February 2018
Congratulations. There are no changes to the legislation or other requirements in your legal register.
 
Recent Publications

New publications this month:

HSE

HSG179: Health and safety in swimming pools

This document provides guidance to owners, operators and managers of swimming pools.

 
Offences

Contractor and manufacturing firm fined for allowing exposure to asbestos

A manufacturing company and contractor have been prosecuted after failing to prevent exposure of workers and others to asbestos.

Frank Allan, trading as ‘Jet Blast and Maintenance was contracted to clean premises including an asbestos cement roof at Carter Brothers (Rochdale) Ltd (Carter Brothers Ltd).

Greater Manchester Magistrates’ Court heard that the work to clean the roof was not necessary and had not been agreed in advance with the property’s landlord. An HSE investigation found that the contractor had failed to identify the risks involved with the task and that insufficient measures were put in place to clean a fragile asbestos roof. As a result, asbestos was found in debris around the premises.

The court heard that Carter Brothers Ltd had not selected a suitable contractor and had not suitably supervised their work. It was considered that if the work was required, Carter Brothers Ltd should have employed a specialist contractor with specialist cleaning equipment.

Breaches

Carter Brothers Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.

  • Section 3(1) requires every employer to ensure that people not in their employment but who may be affected by their actions do not have their health and safety put at risk. 

The contractor pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 6 and Regulation 11 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.

  • Regulation 6 requires that work liable to expose persons to asbestos is not undertaken prior to the completion of a suitable and sufficient assessment of the risks it involves.
  • Regulation 11 requires that measures are put in place before work is begun to prevent adequate or reduce the risk of exposure.

Penalty

Carter Brothers Ltd was fined £8000 with £3913.94 costs.

Frank Allan was fined £330 with £3910.94 costs.

 

Unsafe working at height leads to sentence for scaffolder

A scaffolder has been sentenced after they were found to have been working at height without suitable and sufficient safety measures in place.

The scaffolder had been working in the centre of Manchester when they were observed constructing and working off a scaffold with no edge protection and no harness. The potential fall height was estimated between 13 and 18 metres.

An HSE investigation found that the scaffolder’s employer had taken reasonable steps to enable safe working practices and that the individual was experienced and well trained with access to the correct equipment. The HSE investigation concluded that the scaffolder had been acting alone against their best interest and training. Additionally, the scaffolder was seen to be setting a bad example to a trainee accompanying him at the time.

Breach

The scaffolder pleaded guilty to breaching Section 7(a) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.

  • Section 7(a) requires that employees at work take reasonable care for the health and safety of themselves and of other persons who may be affected by his acts or omissions at work.

Penalty

The scaffolder was sentenced to 26 weeks in prison, suspended for one year, and 100 hours of community service alongside costs of £500 and a victim surcharge of £115.

 

Manufacturer fined after worker suffers life-changing injury

Mekufa (UK) Ltd, a Gloucester-based manufacturing company, has been sentenced after a worker lost his right thumb when his gloved hand got caught on a moving part of a lathe.

An HSE investigation of the incident, which occurred on 11 August 2016, concluded that the risks of working with this machinery were foreseeable but the company had failed to both identify these risks and implement a safe system of work.

Breach

Mekufa (UK) Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

  • Under Section 2 (1) every employer is required to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all employees.

Penalty

Mekufa (UK) Ltd was fined £14,170 and ordered to pay costs of £2,849.50.

Waterman Greenspace