Greenspace logo
Welcome
Climate
  • Home
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • ยป
    Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs

Client Login

Legal Register - Climate

Environmental
  • Select Month:
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
Preview Email
October 2024
Congratulations. There are no changes to the legislation or other requirements in your legal register.
 
Recent Publications

New publications this month:

HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE (HSE) AND INTERNATIONAL POWERED ACCESS FEDERATION (IPAF)

Safe methods of isolation of platform controls on mobile elevating work platforms

IPAF and the HSE have developed new guidance on safely isolating platform controls on Mobile Elevating Work Platforms (MEWPs).

 

 

HSE

Using nitrous oxide (gas and air) safely in maternity units

This new guidance was published in October 2024.

 

New registered building control approver guidance

The following guidance was published on the registered building control approver regime during October 2024:

  • Registered building inspectors: professional misconduct and criminal offences
  • Submitting operational standards rules data
  • Building control bodies: contraventions and criminal offences

 

 

MINISTRY OF HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Updated guidance supporting the Building Safety Act 2022

Higher-risk buildings are defined as buildings with at least two residential units, care homes, and hospitals which are at least 18 metres in height or have at least 7 storeys.

A recent tribunal judgement concluded that roof gardens should be classified as a storey for the purposes of determining whether a building is a higher-risk building. The following guidance has been updated to reflect this tribunal judgement:

  • Criteria for determining whether an existing building is a higher-risk building during building work
  • Criteria for determining whether a new building that is being designed and constructed is a "higher-risk building"
  • Criteria for determining whether a building is a higher-risk building during the occupation phase of the new higher-risk regime

 

 

WELSH GOVERNMENT

Building regulations guidance: part J (heat producing appliances)

Approved Document J, which concerns requirements on heat producing appliances under the Building Regulations, has been updated. The amendments will come into force on 6 January 2025.

The revised requirements concern the provision of carbon monoxide alarms where flued fixed combustion appliances of any fuel type are installed.

 

 

MARITIME AND COASTGUARD AGENCY (MCA)

The following notes and notices relevant to occupational health and safety were published or updated in October 2024:

  • MGN 428 (M+F) Amendment 3 artificial optical radiation regs 2010
  • MGN 578 (M) Amendment 2 use of overside working systems on commercial yachts, small commercial vessels and loadline vessels
  • MGN 592 (M+F) Amendment 2 anchoring, mooring, towing or hauling equipment
  • MGN 659 (M+F) Amendment 2 (entry into enclosed spaces)
  • MGN 669 (M+F) Amendment 2 (Asbestos) regulations 2010
  • MGN 703: Information concerning the training and competence of Remote Operators working with Remotely Operated Unmanned Vessels (ROUVs), certified under the Workboat Code Edition 3
  • Domestic Safety Management code: Instructions for surveyors (MSIS29)
  • Safety Bulletin 35 – Lithium storage solutions Ltd – lithium safety store
  • Offshore renewable energy installations (OREI) Amendment 1
 
Offences

Company fined after an employee suffered severe head injuries

A company has been fined after an employee sustained a fractured skull.

On 19 October 2022, the worker had been removing cattle from the back of a lorry at Grayshill Limited’s site in Glasgow when a telehandler bucket became detached and struck him. In addition to a fractured skull, the worker sustained a broken clavicle, a ripped earlobe and haematomas down his right side.

An HSE investigation found that Grayshill Limited had failed to implement a safe system of work for the use of quick hitches on the telehandler. A quick hitch is a latching device that enables, in this case, the bucket, to be connected to the arm of the telehandler and changed quickly. A manual quick hitch requires an operator to manually insert a metal pin from the latching device to secure the attachment.

On the morning of 19 October 2022, a self-employed agricultural engineer had serviced the telehandler, which included removing the bucket but the engineer did not correctly reattach it onto the telehandler after the service was complete. The securing pin for the quick hitch had not been reinserted.

Breach

Grayshill Limited pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1), Section 2(2)(a) and Section 33(1)(a) to the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974:

  • Section 2(1) applies a duty on every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all employees.
  • Section 2(2)(a) states that the duty under Section 2(1) specifically concerns the provision and maintenance of plant and systems of work that are, so far as is reasonably practicable, safe and without risks to health.
  • Section 33(1)(a) makes it an offence to fail to discharge duties under Sections 2 through 7.

Penalty

Grayshill Limited was fined £80,000 and ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £6,000.

 

Metal recycling firm receives six-figure fine following an HSE inspection

ASM Metal Recycling received a large fine after the HSE identified major safety failings at its site in Aylesbury.

On 3 and 8 August 2023, an HSE inspector attended the Aylesbury premises. The inspector observed dangerous working practices, including a failure to segregate moving vehicles from pedestrians as waste was being manually sorted.

Videos taken during the inspection show three pedestrian workers wearing yellow hi-vis sleeveless jackets, sorting waste in the yard close to three 360 grab excavators operating behind them.  As they continue to hand-sort the waste, an HGV skip lorry pulls forwards and reverses towards and past them.  At this point, two of the workers had their backs towards the reversing HGV. The footage shows there were no measures, such as barriers, to prevent the reversing vehicle striking the workers.

A subsequent HSE investigation identified that ASM Metal Recycling Ltd had previously identified the risks of pedestrian-vehicle collision but had failed to implement effective control measures to prevent this.

The HSE had previously served enforcement notices on ASM Metal Recycling Ltd in 2010, 2014, 2016 and 2018.  The HSE also submitted Notification of Contravention letters to the company in 2021 and 2023.

Breach

ASM Metal Recycling Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

Penalty

ASM Metal Recycling Ltd was fined £650,000 and ordered to pay £5,885 in costs.

 

Yorkshire cosmetics company fined for electrical safety failings

Sabel Cosmetics Limited has been fined after an HSE inspection found serious electrical failings.

On 5 July 2022, the HSE carried out an unannounced inspection at Sabel Cosmetics Limited’s premises in Halifax. This inspection uncovered electrical deficiencies that posed serious risks of electric shock and electrocution to workers.

A subsequent HSE investigation found there was a systemic failure within the company to address the risks identified with the electrical systems. The inadequate construction and maintenance of the electrical system at the premises presented an immediate risk of employees coming into direct contact with exposed live parts on equipment and machinery within the company premises. The company allowed the breaches to subsist over a long period of time.

Breach

Sabel Cosmetics Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 4(1) of the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989:

  •  Regulation 4(1) requires all systems to be of such construction to prevent, so are as is reasonably practicable, danger at all times.

Penalty

Sabel Cosmetics Ltd was fined £56,695 and ordered to pay £5,949 in costs.

Waterman Greenspace