Greenspace logo
Welcome
Climate
  • Home
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • ยป
    Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs

Client Login

Legal Register - Climate

Environmental
  • Select Month:
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
Preview Email
May 2022
Congratulations. There are no changes to the legislation or other requirements in your legal register.
 
Recent Publications

New publications this month:

HOME OFFICE

Fire Safety Act 2021

This series of guidance concerns fire safety obligations of responsible persons for buildings containing two or more sets of domestic premises. This reflects Section 1 of the Fire Safety Act 2021, which came into force in England on 16 May 2022.

responsible persons are now required to undertake fire risk assessments taking building structures, external walls, windows and flat entrance doors into common parts into account.

  • Fire Safety Act commencement: prioritisation guidance
  • Fire risk assessment prioritisation tool
    This tool includes weighted questions, which aim to assist responsible persons in prioritising the review of fire risk assessments for their buildings.
  • Fire Safety Act 2021 factsheet: Information on commencement of sections 1 and 3 of the Fire Safety Act
  • Fire Safety Act 2021 factsheet: Information for lenders
 
Offences

County Council fined after employees developed hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)

Lancashire County Council has been fined after several employees carrying out work in the highways department developed HAVS.

In February 2019, HSE received a RIDDOR report from the council regarding a HAVS case diagnosis. An improvement notice was served to the council in July 2019 requiring the council to improve their control of hand-arm vibration. Despite this note, a further ten cases of vibration-related ill-health, unrelated to the RIDDOR report, were identified and reported late. Four more reports were also filed within the mandatory time period.

An HSE investigation found that there had been insufficient supervision and monitoring by the council to ensure that operatives accurately recorded their levels of exposure to vibration. Additionally, health surveillance records had not been acted upon promptly to reduce or stop exposure when symptoms were reported.

Risk assessments were inadequate to control the amount of exposure of operatives, and practices had not been implemented to prevent overexposure. It was also found that the council had failed to send reports of the various diagnoses to HSE without delay as required under the RIDDOR regime.

Breach

Lancashire County Council pleaded guilty to breaches of Section 2(1) and Section 3(1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and Regulation 8 of the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013.

  • Section 2(1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974 requires every employer to ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, the health, safety, and welfare at work of all their employees.
  • Section 3(1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974 makes it the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that persons not in his employment who may be affected are not exposed to risks to their health or safety.
  • Regulation 8 of the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 requires responsible persons to report the occupational diseases listed in the Regulation to the HSE in accordance with the regulations.

Penalty

Lancashire County Council was fined £50,000 and ordered to pay costs of £10,366,78.

 

Two West Yorkshire businesses fired after an HGV driver was injured by falling pallets

Two West Yorkshire businesses have received fines after a HGV driver suffered a fracture to one of his neck vertebrae.

On 5 August 2020 the delivery driver, an employee of Brighouse Pallet Services Ltd, was struck by falling pallets when they were being unloaded from a HGV trailer by a forklift truck operator employed by Seal It Services Ltd at this company’s site in Elland.

An HSE investigation found that both companies had failed to provide a safe system of work for the task. Control measures were inadequate to ensure that all delivery drivers who visited the Seal It Services Ltd’s site were moved to a safe location while HGV trailers were being unloaded by forklift trucks.

Breaches

Brighouse Pallet Services Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

Seal It Services Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

Penalties

Brighouse Pallet Services Ltd was fined £4,000 and ordered to pay £4806.60 in costs.

Seal It Services Ltd was fined £50,000  and ordered to pay £4,654.90 in costs.

 

Sea food processor fined after workplace fatality

A sea food processing company in Shetland has been fined after a worker died after she was run over by a forklift truck

On 31 January 2018 the employee of QA Fish Ltd suffered significant leg injuries as a pedestrian, following a vehicular collision.

A joint HSE and Police Scotland investigation found that a site-specific workplace transport risk assessment had not been carried out. Although the use of the forklift truck was critical to business, the company failed to provide suitable and sufficient control measures to ensure that pedestrians and vehicles could circulate in a safe manner in the exterior of the premises, particularly with regards to the forklift truck.

QA Fish Ltd had failed to implement effective arrangements for the management of health and safety and also failed to act on the advice of a health and safety consultant several years prior to the incident.

Breach

QA Fish Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) and Section 33(1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

  • Section 33(1) makes it an offence to breach various sections of the Act, including Section 2.

Penalty

QA Fish Ltd was fined £80,000, to be paid within 12 months.

Waterman Greenspace