Greenspace logo
Welcome
Climate
  • Home
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs
  • Policy & Reporting
  • Bulletin Board
  • ยป
    Legal Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • Docs

Client Login

Legal Register - Climate

Environmental
  • Select Month:
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
Preview Email
May 2015
Congratulations. There are no changes to the legislation or other requirements in your legal register.
 
Recent Publications

HSE

L149: Mines Regulations 2014: Guidance on regulations

This guidance document replaces nine former Approved Codes of Practices. Guidance is updated to reflect the revocation and replacement of a broad range of mining health and safety legislation with the Mines Regulations 2014.

Approved code of Practice L43 (First-aid at mines) remains in force.

INDG411: Need building work done? A short guide for clients on the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015

This leaflet provides brief guidance on clients having maintenance, small-scale building work or other work carried out.

HSG280: Guidance for licence holders on the containment and control of specified animal pathogens

This guidance is aimed at persons holding Specified Animal Pathogen Order licences, users and biosafety professionals.

Safety Notices

FOD 1-2015: Earth Moving Machinery – changes to visibility requirements

This notice concerns actions on visibility to be taken by manufacturers supplying earth moving and derivative machinery to the UK market.

 

HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE NORTHERN IRELAND (HSENI)

HSENI has approved the following Approved Code of Practice documents for use in Northern Ireland:

  • L22: Safe use of work equipment: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. Approved Code of Practice and guidance
  • L112: Safe use of power presses: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (as applied to power presses). Approved Code of Practice and guidance
  • L114: Safe use of woodworking machinery: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (as applied to woodworking machinery). Approved Code of Practice and guidance
  • L148: Safety in Docks: Approved Code of Practice and guidance
 
Offences

Construction firm prosecuted after falling roof sheets narrowly miss karting party

A construction company has been fined after metal sheets crashed through a karting track roof – narrowly missing members of the public. The incident happened at The Raceway on the Park Lane Trading Estate, Oldbury, on 16 April 2014, where Barnsley-based KSMT Ltd had been employed to overclad the roof.

Sandwell Magistrates’ Court heard today a sub-contractor had lifted new metal roof sheets, which weighed three quarters of a tonne, on to the roof using the forks of a telehandler.

However, the sheets and one of the forks fell off and through the existing corrugated roof before crashing through a raised section of the kart track inside and coming to rest on the lower section of track.

Ten racers were using the circuit at the time, although thankfully none were in the area where the materials landed narrowly having passed through seconds earlier.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found the lifting operation was poorly planned. KSMT, as the main contractor for the work, failed to assess the risks or produce a method statement or lifting plan. Metal was loaded directly on to metal, increasing the risk of slipping, and the forks of the telehandler were not wide enough to take the load.

KSMT Ltd, of Fall Bank Industrial Estate, Dodworth, Barnsley, was fined £5000 and ordered to pay a further £500 in costs with a £500 victim surcharge after pleading guilty to a single breach of the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998.

  • Regulation 8(1) of the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 states: Every employer shall ensure that every lifting operation involving lifting equipment is properly planned by a competent person; appropriately supervised; and carried out in a safe manner.

 

Leak of dangerous substance leads to £20,000 of fines

A leak of corrosive potassium hydroxide on a lorry was an ‘immediate risk’ to public safety – but, after noticing it, the driver continued a 12-mile journey.

Magistrates were told that some of the 170 plastic jerricans containing 45 per cent solution of the corrosive substance had not been adequately tightened, nor securely stacked on pallets, which in turn were not adequately braced on the trailer. The jerricans toppled over whilst being transported from Whitman Laboratories Ltd, in Petersfield, Hampshire, to Belgium, by a driver working for Allport Cargo Services Ltd, on 30 March 2014.

The driver noticed his load was leaking during a stop at a motorway service station on the M2 in Kent. He phoned his transport supervisor and said the substance was corrosive and that he wanted the emergency services to be called.

After consulting her line manager, the transport supervisor directed the driver to return to the company depot in Sittingbourne, some 12 miles away. On arrival, the extent of damage was realised and the emergency services were finally called –nearly two hours after the leak was originally discovered.

Six fire engines attended the scene and hosed down the contaminated area. The driver and warehouse supervisor, who had been called in to assist, were believed to have been exposed to the material. They were stripped down and hosed on site, before being taken to hospital for observation. The service station was also decontaminated.

Around 85 litres of potassium hydroxide was lost.

It transpired, during an investigation by HSE, that the jerricans had been loaded by an unsupervised contract employee, who had only started the job as a loader that week. The loader did not know how loads should be safety stowed and had not loaded a dangerous consignment previously. Whitman provided little guidance on safe stowage.

At Medway Magistrates’ Court, both companies pleaded guilty to a single offence under the Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2009. They were each fined £20,000 with costs of £3,438 and a £120 victim surcharge.

  • Allport Cargo Services Ltd, of High Street, Cowley, Uxbridge, Middlesex, admitted they failed to comply with the requirements of CDG Regulation 5 in that they carried dangerous goods, namely over 4000kg of 45% potassium hydroxide solution, where that carriage did not comply with the applicable requirements of ADR (i.e. Annexes A and B to the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road, as revised or reissued), including:
    • a) carrying dangerous goods that were not adequately restrained as required by ADR 7.5.7.1;
    • b) failing to immediately notify the emergency services when there was an immediate risk to public safety as required by ADR 1.4.1.2; and
    • c) continuing a transport operation when the consignment did not comply with applicable regulations and without the authorization of the competent authority as per ADR 1.4.2.2.4.
  • Whitman Laboratories Ltd, of Bedford Road, Petersfield, Hampshire, admitted they failed to comply with the applicable requirements of ADR for carriage of the same consignment by:
    • a)not providing training to the employee who loaded the consignment about the requirements governing the carriage of dangerous goods in accordance with ADR 1.3.2 appropriate to his responsibilities and duties;
    • b) allowing the employee to perform functions for which training had not been provided whilst not being under the direct supervision of a trained person as required by ADR 1.3.1;
    • c) loading dangerous goods that were not adequately restrained contrary to ADR 7.5.7.1;
    • d) consigning and loading dangerous goods in non-removable head jerricans with closures that were not applied so that they were secure and leak-proof under normal conditions of carriage as per ADR 6.1.4.8.5

 

Staffordshire plastics firm fined for failing to maintain workers insurance

Merlin Mouldings (Hednesford) Ltd has been fined for failing to have Employers Liability Insurance for its workers in place.

Despite repeated warnings and reminders from The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) the company failed to have insurance in place, despite it being a legal requirement.

The company of Rugeley Road, Hednesford were sentenced in their absence by Stafford Magistrates Court on Wednesday 13 May 2015 and fined £2,500 for breaching the Employers Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969. They were also ordered to pay costs of £3,191.80 and a victim surcharge of £120.

Waterman Greenspace