UK & EU Climate News
Global Climate News
United States continues significant rollback of environmental protection and climate initiatives
A series of policies by the Trump Administration has significantly rolled back environmental regulation and climate initiatives. Some actions through April 2025 include:
Executive Order targeting State and local climate policies: President Trump signed the "Protecting American Energy from State Overreach" executive order, directing the Department of Justice to identify and challenge state and local climate laws deemed to overstep constitutional or statutory authority. The order specifically targets policies affecting fossil fuels and other energy sectors, citing examples from states like New York, Vermont, and California.
Emergency waiver for E15 Gasoline Sales: The Environmental Protection Agency issued an emergency waiver allowing the nationwide sale of E15 gasoline—a blend containing 15% ethanol—during the summer months. Traditionally restricted due to smog concerns, this move aims to bolster fuel supplies, reduce gasoline prices, and support domestic agriculture.
Proposed Changes to the Endangered Species Act: The administration proposed redefining "harm" under the Endangered Species Act to exclude habitat destruction, focusing solely on direct injury or killing of animals. This change could remove habitat-based protections for endangered species
Support for Deep-Sea Mining: The administration issued an executive order supporting deep-sea mineral exploration under domestic laws, potentially bypassing international oversight by the International Seabed Authority. This move has raised environmental and geopolitical concerns, particularly regarding areas like the Clarion-Clipperton Zone.
Reinvigoration of the Coal Industry: President Trump signed an executive order titled "Reinvigorating America's Beautiful Clean Coal Industry," aiming to boost coal production by relaxing emissions regulations and permitting coal mining on federal lands.
Budget Cuts to Environmental and Science Agencies: Budget planning documents indicated the administration's intention to significantly reduce funding for various science agencies in Fiscal Year 2026. Notably, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) faced a proposed 26% cut, including the elimination of the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, which plays a crucial role in climate research.
Investors pulled $8.6bn from sustainable funds in Q1
According to Morningstar Sustainalytics, global sustainable investment funds faced record losses in early 2025, with $8.6 billion in net outflows, largely due to the Trump Administration's anti-ESG policies.This marks the biggest quarterly withdrawal on record for sustainable open-end and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), following strong $18.1 billion inflows in late 2024. The decline was mainly driven by continued outflows in the US, a sharp reversal in Europe, and regional downturns across Asia, including Japan. Political pressure, regulatory uncertainty, and waning faith in ESG’s long-term prospects were cited as key factors.
The US recorded its 10th straight quarter of outflows, losing $6.1 billion, while Europe saw its first-ever net outflows ($1.2 billion) since Morningstar began tracking in 2018. Asia also posted losses, though smaller, with Japan’s outflows falling slightly under $900 million. Only Canada, Australia, and New Zealand saw modest inflows of about $300 million each.
Sustainable funds’ organic growth turned negative (-0.27%) compared to a 0.90% rise for global funds overall. Morningstar’s Hortense Bioy noted a broader shift in sentiment towards sustainable strategies, with increasing consolidation, rebranding, and cautious fund development amid growing ESG resistance, especially in the US.
Europe, traditionally a stronghold for ESG investing, also showed signs of retreat. Active sustainable funds lost $5 billion, while passive ESG funds added just $3.7 billion—an all-time low. Trump's renewed presidency and attacks on diversity and climate policies have dampened ESG enthusiasm globally, with European investors growing more cautious amid tightening regulations like the EU’s ‘Omnibus’ package.
Rebranding efforts surged, with over 180 European funds dropping terms like "ESG" and "sustainable" from their names in Q1 2025. Newer terms such as "transition," "screened," and "climate" are being used to appeal to ESG-conscious investors without overt political associations. In the UK, the new Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR) have added complexity: just 94 funds adopted official sustainability labels, while hundreds preferred disclosures without formal labelling, often still using softer ESG-related terms.
Climate backslide among oil and gas giants
Political shifts, notably Donald Trump's re-election and the Ukraine war-driven energy crisis, have accelerated a retreat among major oil and gas companies from global climate targets, according to a new Carbon Tracker report. The study assessed 30 leading upstream producers across six criteria, including emissions targets and investment strategies, grading them from A to H. No company scored above a 'D', and none performed strongly across multiple categories.
Despite global commitments like the pledge to triple renewable energy by 2030, many top producers are expanding fossil fuel operations and backing projects misaligned with the Paris Agreement, with momentum increasing since Trump's inauguration. Carbon Tracker’s Rich Collett-White warned that most companies are ignoring forecasts of peaking demand, urging investors to reconsider support for risky, short-term fossil fuel expansion.
European firms generally outperformed their US and national counterparts. Spain’s Repsol ranked highest, with the UK’s Harbour close behind. However, even major European players like BP, Shell, and TotalEnergies saw their grades fall due to Paris-incompatible production targets, with BP’s score dropping sharply after it abandoned its 2030 reduction plans. Meanwhile, US oil majors ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips, along with several national oil companies, received the lowest 'H' grade.
The report also highlighted the increasing reliance on LNG projects, which many companies promote as a transitional fuel, despite their misalignment with net-zero goals. While there has been some improvement on methane emissions, many firms, including CNOOC and Coterra, continue to struggle with major leaks. Regulatory rollbacks in the US have further undermined methane control efforts.
For investors and financial institutions, the report sounds a warning: firms clinging to high-carbon strategies could expose themselves to serious long-term risks. Studies suggest the UK economy is particularly vulnerable to a fossil fuel-driven financial crisis, with potential bank bailouts and pension losses looming if fossil assets become stranded amid a global shift toward net zero.
Climate risks of $38trn by 2050 in a 2.5C warming scenario
Investors in the food and drink sector have been urged to strengthen their climate risk strategies, with potential damages estimated to reach $38 trillion by 2050 under a likely 2.5C warming scenario. The UN previously warned that, even if current Paris Agreement pledges are fully met, global temperatures would still rise by around 2.6C–2.8C by 2100 — a forecast made before Donald Trump's second withdrawal of the US from the Agreement.
The First Sentier MUFG Sustainable Investment Institute emphasised that food systems are highly exposed to climate-related risks and that investors must act now to enhance resilience. A new briefing highlights that global food demand is set to grow faster than population rates over the next decade, while extreme weather events will increasingly threaten food production through floods, droughts, storms, and temperature extremes.
Although investors tend to support downstream sectors like food processing and retail, the Institute stressed that supply chain vulnerabilities leave them significantly exposed to climate risks. Institute director Sudip Harza warned that agricultural systems face mounting threats as the world approaches critical climate tipping points, urging investors to embed climate adaptation into their decision-making to protect food security and investment returns.
The briefing provides practical advice, recommending that investors integrate climate risk into due diligence, support innovative finance models for climate-resilient food systems, and engage companies for deeper disclosures. Specifically, investors should request:
Frameworks such as TCFD, TNFD, and ESRS can guide companies in making these disclosures.
Separately, an anonymous letter from food industry insiders warned investors that many companies underplay climate risks in disclosures, treating reporting as a compliance formality rather than a call to action.
Meanwhile, rising cocoa prices — up 400% — provide a real-world glimpse into these growing challenges. Research by Christian Aid shows that climate change, through more frequent extreme heat and erratic rainfall, is devastating cacao-growing regions like Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana, endangering farmer livelihoods and pushing up chocolate prices.
Climate change reshaping the spread of infectious diseases
As global temperatures rise, the spread of infectious diseases is rapidly evolving in unexpected ways. In an article published on The Inside Climate News, Dr Angelle Disiree LaBeaud, a physician-scientist and epidemiologist at Stanford University provides insights into how rising temperatures and environmental changes are affecting disease dynamics. These include:
Respiratory Diseases: Climate change alters the seasonality and distribution of respiratory illnesses, such as influenza, by influencing temperature and humidity patterns.
Waterborne and Foodborne Diseases: Warmer temperatures create favourable conditions for pathogens to thrive in water and food sources, increasing the risk of diseases like cholera and salmonella.
Vector-Borne Diseases: Changes in climate are expanding the habitats of disease-carrying vectors like mosquitoes and ticks, leading to the spread of diseases such as malaria, dengue, and Lyme disease into new regions.
Health Equity Concerns: The convergence of climate change with other crises, such as pollution, disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, exacerbating existing health disparities.
The article underscores the urgency of integrating climate change considerations into public health strategies to mitigate the growing threat of climate-sensitive infectious diseases.
New Research