Greenspace logo
Welcome
Climate Space
  • Home
  • Climate Obligation Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • TCFD Gap Analysis
    • Help
  • Docs
  • »
    Climate Obligation Register
    • Full Report
    • Calendar
    • Monthly Updates
    • Help
  • »
    TCFD Gap Analysis
    • Help
  • Docs

Client Login

Legal Register - Climate Space

  • Select Month:
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
Preview Email
Changes for December 2016 - Environmental

Pertinent Legislation Amended in December 2016
CLIMATE CHANGE LEVY (GENERAL) REGULATIONS 2001, AS AMENDED
 

Members of climate change agreements (CCAs) receive discounts on the climate change levy paid on energy supplied in return for subscribing to negotiated emissions reduction targets. 

The Climate Change Agreements (Administration) (Amendment and Related Provision) Regulations 2016 amend the Climate Change Agreements (Administration) Regulations 2012.

What has been updated?

Companies failing to meet targets under climate change agreements between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019 will be required to pay an increased ‘buy-out’ fee of £14 for every tonne carbon dioxide equivalent the targets have been missed by. The buy-out fee is currently £12 per tonne carbon dioxide equivalent.

The Environment Agency has also been appointed as the administrator of the scheme.

These regulations came into force on 30 December 2016.

Recent Publications

New publications this month:

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY

Environment Agency enforcement, sanctions and offences

This guidance document explains how the Environment Agency make enforcement decisions. The document has been updated to reflect changes in legislation from 1 January 2017.

 

Regulatory Position Statement (RPS) 36: Stack, store or treat litter, straw, manure and slurry arising from an exotic animal disease outbreak: RPS 36

Persons complying with this RPS may stack, store and treat infectious litter, straw, manure and slurry arising from an exotic animal disease outbreak without an environmental permit.

 

Oil storage regulations for businesses

Two more oil types have been added this guidance document: cutting fluids and insulating oils.

 

Packaging Waste

Packaging waste: become a packaging producer compliance scheme (PCS)

This guidance document has been updated to reflect the 2016 amendments to the producer responsibility regulations.

 

Packaging waste: producer responsibilities

The requirement to submit an operational plan no longer applies to packaging producers and this has now been reflected in this guidance document.

 

Packaging waste: apply to be an accredited reprocessor or exporter

Information on Agency Agreed Industry Grades and protocols have been updated.

 

Water Framework Directive

List of chemicals for Water Framework Directive assessments

This publication lists priority substances under the Water Framework Directive and Environmental Quality Directive. This list should be used during the water quality scoping stage of a Water Framework Directive assessment.

 

Water Framework Directive assessment: estuarine and coastal waters

This document provides guidance on how to assess the impact of an activity in esturine and coastal waters for the Water Framework Directive.

 
Offences

New offences this month:

Oxfordshire man guilty of running illegal waste operation

Geoffrey Parker from Oxfordshire has been found guilty of committing two environmental offences. He pleaded guilty at Reading Magistrates Court to holding waste illegally.

Environment Agency officers discovered illegal waste in over 40 skips which were scattered along the approaching lane to the site. In the yard area at the entrance to the site, environment officers saw a large amount of general household clearance type waste on a concrete pad, with more waste stacked up behind. Hazardous materials were also seen including car batteries, leaking paint pots and containers with chemicals in skips.

The firm was instructed to reduce the size of the pile, but it failed to meet the deadline, blaming staff illness.

The Environment Agency suspended the company’s permit in September, preventing it from bringing any more wood on to the site. This was later reinstated when the company agreed to reduce stocks on site.

A compliance visit found that all waste wood stacks had increased in size, and stacks that had previously been compliant had been combined to form larger piles.

The firm had previously committed offences.

Penalty

Mr Parker received a 4-month custodial sentence suspended for 1 year and was ordered to pay over £7,600. The Magistrates also made a remediation order (under Regulation 44 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010) which requires the removal of all waste from the farm and Cox’s Lane by the end of January 2017.

 

Teesside wood recycling firm fined for environmental permitting offences

UK Wood Recycling Ltd admitted keeping waste wood in a way likely to cause pollution to the environment or harm to human health. The company had significantly exceeded the maximum sizes stated for wood piles and lacked the recommended firebreaks as specified in guidance from the Environment Agency. This was the reason as to why a fire in 2013 had previously occurred.

BRE Global said the way the company had stored the wood piles were risky and made spontaneous combustion highly likely.

Penalty

UK Wood Recycling Ltd were fined £72,000, ordered to pay costs of £71,335, and a victim surcharge of £120.

 

Company fined after chemical leak at Sunderland site

Tradebe Solvent Recycling Ltd has pleaded guilty to two offences of failing to comply with conditions under its environmental permit. Breaches resulted in a leak affecting groundwater when a hose was left fitted to a fixed storage tanker.

The company reported the spill immediately to the Environment Agency.

The Environment Agency found that the leak of 4000 litres of isopropyl alcohol, which had affected groundwater, was a result of deficient management systems and operating procedures. The court heard that Tradebe Solvent Recycling Ltd had not formally inspected pipes and operating procedures for the transfer of liquid chemicals were inadequate.

Penalty

The company was fined £27,000 and ordered to pay costs of £11,960.

Waterman Greenspace