Climate Greenspace Environmental Legal Update: January 2016


Welcome to the Climate Greenspace Environmental Legal Update: January 2016 monthly email as part of your subscription to Waterman's Greenspace platform. The monthly updates show any:

  • new legal entries added to your register;
  • amendments to legal entries in your register; and
  • legal entries removed from your legal register.

It also contains links to new publications from Government and regulatory bodies and examples of relevant offences, highlighting how legislation is implemented and enforced in practice.
As well as receiving this update by email you will also find it saved on your Greenspace site under the Legal Register > Monthly Updates tab at the top of your Greenspace page.


 
 
 
 
January 2016
 
 
Congratulations. There are no changes to the legislation or other requirements in your legal register.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recent Publications
 
 

New publications this month:


ENVIRONMENT AGENCY

MCERTS: examination syllabuses for manual stack emission monitoring

Examination syllabuses for manual stack emission monitoring under MCERTS have been updated. Questions on EN ISO 16911-1:2013 will be introduced into examinations for Technical Endorsement 1 from 1 March 2016.  

 

Waste batteries and accumulators: technical guidance

This guidance document has been updated to reflect that any battery above 4kg will be classed as industrial by default from 1 January 2016.

 

HTGN M3: How to assess monitoring arrangements for emissions to air in permit applications

Technical guidance note (Monitoring) M3 has been updated.

Background

This technical guidance note provides guidance to Environment Agency staff, monitoring contractors and industry.

 

Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE): reuse and treatment

This document has been updated to provide more guidance on the recovery and recycling rate template.

Background

This document provides guidance on how to apply to become an approved authorised treatment facility (AATF) and how to operate legally under the approval.

 

WEEE: evidence and national protocols guidance

What has been updated?

This updated document includes guidance on the recovery and recycling rate template.

Background

This guidance document explains how to issue evidence, meet and report on recovery and recycling targets and apply protocols on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE).

 

THE OIL AND PIPELINE AGENCY

Oil and Pipelines Agency: Major accident prevention policy

This updated document sets out the major accident prevention policy created by the oil and pipeline agency.

Background

Regulation 5 of the COMAH Regulations requires all COMAH operators to prepare a document setting out their policy for preventing major accidents (MAPP)

 

NABARRO LLP: JANUARY 2016 ENVIRONMENT BRIEFING

The meaning of ‘environmental damage’

Case: R (Seiont, Gwyrfai and Llyfni Anglers' Society) v Natural Resources Wales and others (2015)

This case considered in detail the scope of the concept of "environmental damage" under the Environmental Liability Directive 2004 (the Directive) and the Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) (Wales) Regulations 2009 (the Regulations).

The court held that "environmental damage" means a deterioration of the environmental condition. It does not include the prevention or slowing of an already damaged environmental state from achieving an acceptable level in environmental terms.

 

DEPARTMENT FOR BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND SKILLS AND ENVIRONMENT AGENCY

Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) collection: code of practice

This guidance document sets out how a designated collection facility (DCF) must manage its separately collected WEEE.

This code sets out:

  • why it exists and who it applies to
  • minimum operational standards
  • guidance on what the contract must include
  • enforcement action for non-compliance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Offences
 
 

Oxfordshire company guilty of allowing waste crime

A court has heard how an investigation by the Environment Agency identified that an illegal skip hire business was operated between 2010 and 2013 near Farringdon in Oxfordshire. The skip hire business was operated by Tapecrown Ltd and another tenant deposited large quantities of tyres on the site.

Oxford Crown Court heard that Tapecrown Ltd allowed the storage, treatment and burning of waste at the Faringdon premises without the necessary permits. Environmental permits must be held authorising these operations, unless a suitable waste management exemption is available.

Breach and penalty

Tapecrown Ltd was fined £20,000 and Mr Crossley Cooke was fined £4,000. Further costs for the company and Mr Cooke will be determined at a later date. Mr Cooke was classed as the controlling mind of Tapecrown Limited and was therefore prosecuted.

 

Yorkshire Water fined £600,000 after sewage pollution hits Wakefield fishery

Yorkshire Water Services Ltd has received a large fine after it was found that it had been negligent in the maintenance of sewage pipework. In October 2013 a sewage pipe from the company’s Shay Lane pumping station burst, resulting the discharge of raw sewage to the Walton Colliery Nature Park and Barnsley Canal. More than 860 dead fish were subsequently removed from these water bodies.

The court heard that four bursts had occurred on the sewage pipe in the preceding two years. In each case Yorkshire Water had attributed this to the age-related deterioration of the pipe.

Breach and penalty

Yorkshire Water Services Ltd has been fined £600,000 after an ageing sewage pipe burst and killed hundreds of fish in a Wakefield lake. The company pleaded guilty to one charge of causing a water discharge that was not authorised by an environmental permit.

 

Thames Water fined £1 million for pollution to Grand Union Canal

Thames Water has received the highest fine ever issued to a water company in a prosecution to date.

The court heard that Thames Water caused repeated discharges of polluting matter from Tring Sewage Treatment Works to enter the Wendover Arm of the Grand Union Canal in Hertfordshire between July 2012 and April 2013. Discharged sewage can have a significant adverse impact on organisms within water bodies.

Thames Water holds a permit to discharge treated effluent to the canal from the works. The court heard that ineffective inlet screens had caused equipment at the works to block. This lead to the release of sewage debris and sludge. Breach and penalty

Thames Water pleaded guilty before Watford Magistrates Court to two charges under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010. St Albans Crown Court ordered the company to pay a fine of £1 million, costs of £18,113.08 and a victim surcharge of £120.

 
 
 
 
 
 
Kenny Wintle
e: kenny.wintle@watermangroup.com

Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Ltd
2nd Floor | Cubo | 38 Carver Street | Sheffield | S1 4FS | t: 0114 2298900
Pickfords Wharf | Clink St | London | SE1 9DG, t: 0207 928 7888

Waterman Greenspace takes the burden out of your Management Systems and the hard work from Compliance.

Waterman has taken all reasonable precautions to ensure that information contained in this bulletin is accurate, but stresses that the content is not intended to be comprehensive. Waterman recommends that no action be taken on matters covered in this bulletin without taking full professional advice. Waterman holds the copyright for the Legal Update which is sent to you on the basis that it should not be used or reproduced in any material or other medium produced by you or passed to any third parties without the prior consent of Waterman.
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
© 2025 Waterman Group plc
 
 
 


The contents of this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any views stated herein do not necessarily represent the view of the company and are those of the individual sender, except where it specifically states them to be the views of the Company.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mis-transmission. If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it and all copies and e-mail a notification to the sender. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may constitute a breach of confidence.


All reasonable precautions have been taken to see that no viruses are present in this e-mail. Waterman Group cannot accept liability for loss, disruption or damage however caused, arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments and recommend that you subject these to virus checking procedures prior to use.
E-mail messages may be monitored and by replying to this message the recipient gives their consent to such monitoring.