Climate Greenspace Health and Safety Legal Update: December 2014


Welcome to the Climate Greenspace Health and Safety Legal Update: December 2014 monthly email as part of your subscription to Waterman's Greenspace platform. The monthly updates show any:

  • new legal entries added to your register;
  • amendments to legal entries in your register; and
  • legal entries removed from your legal register.

It also contains links to new publications from Government and regulatory bodies and examples of relevant offences, highlighting how legislation is implemented and enforced in practice.
As well as receiving this update by email you will also find it saved on your Greenspace site under the Legal Register > Monthly Updates tab at the top of your Greenspace page.


 
 
 
 
December 2014
 
 
Congratulations. There are no changes to the legislation or other requirements in your legal register.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recent Publications
 
 

HSE

L122: Safety of pressure systems; Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000. Approved Code of Practice and guidance

This updated ACoP concerns the safe design and use of pressure systems. The content of this document has not significantly changed following the previous edition, but has instead been updated for clarity. Further information is provided on the application of regulations to small pressure vessels in schools.

L113: Safe use of lifting equipment: Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998. Approved Code of Practice and guidance

This updated ACoP concerns the use of lifting equipment. The content of the document has been updated to improve its clarity.

L101: Safe work in confined spaces: Confined Spaces Regulations 1997. Approved Code of Practice and guidance

This updated ACoP concerns persons working in confined spaces, those representing them and the provision of training for this work. The content of the document has not changed significantly since the last edition, although further information is provided on workplace risks and the need to check, examine  and test confined space equipment.

L133: Unloading petrol from road tankers: Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002. Approved Code of Practice

This ACoP has been updated to address changes to relevant legislation since the last edition. Further text has been added to require that employers have in place, and maintain, systems to contact the emergency services.

 

Updated Diving at Work ACoPs

The HSE has updated its series of ACoPs on diving at work to improve the quality of the guidance provided and their clarity.

 

Research Report Series

The HSE published the following research reports in December 2014:

 

ECHA

Guidance on the Prior Informed Consent Regulation (PIC) (EU) No 649/2012

ECHA has issued its first guidance document for duty holders on the PIC Regulation, which controls the export and import of certain hazardous chemicals.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Offences
 
 

Firms in court after worker killed in quarry

A quarry operator and contractor have been ordered to pay a total of £237,500 in fines and costs after a worker was killed when he became trapped under a large stone crushing machine.

The injured party was working for Ward Bros (Plant Hire) Ltd as a mechanical fitter when the incident occurred in February 2009. The incident took place at Divethill Quarry in Northumberland, which is owned by CEMEX UK Materials Ltd.

The Court heard how the worker was told there was a problem with the conveyor on a large mobile crushing machine. He went underneath to identify the cause of the problem and while he was there the crusher moved, trapping him. The worker subsequently died from asphyxiation.

A HSE investigation found the movement of the machine was caused by a failure of the insulation on an electrical control wire causing a ground fault. This would have been prevented if the machine had been isolated or locked off from its power source before any maintenance.

The quarry rules required a permit for the work being undertaken, which would have meant the crusher had to be isolated and signed off by a supervisor or manager. No permit was issued and it was discovered there was no lock off facility on the machine.

HSE also established that there was no effective supervision of the work by either company.

The investigation also found that the crushing machine was in a poorly maintained condition, some of the workers using the machine were not qualified to operate it, and that safety records for some Ward Bros (Plant Hire) Ltd employees were not up to date.

Ward Bros (Plant Hire) Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. The company was fined £85,000 and ordered to pay £55,000 in costs.

CEMEX UK Materials Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. The company was fined £60,000 and ordered to pay £37,500 in costs. The court accepted the breaches CEMEX UK admitted to were not causative of Mr Ward’s death.

  • Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 states: “It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees.”

  • Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 states: “It shall be the duty of every employer to conduct his undertaking in such a way as to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that persons not in his employment who may be affected thereby are not thereby exposed to risks to their health or safety.”

 

Packaging firm in court over worker’s injuries

An Ebbw Vale-based packaging company has been has been fined after a delivery driver was hit by a forklift truck at its premises.

The Court heard that the injured driver attended Platt Packaging Ltd on 7 October 2013 to collect palleted products for distribution.

While his lorry was being loaded the driver was on a telephone call with his employer when he was suddenly struck by a reversing forklift truck and knocked to the ground. He suffered a double fracture to his left ankle, damage to his leg and spent over a month in hospital. He has been unable to return to work.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found that Platt Packaging had no formal safe system of work in place for delivery operations. The company also failed to provide instructions for delivery drivers to be in a place of safety while the forklift truck was in use. 

Platt Packaging Limited was fined a total of £10,000 and ordered to pay £4,663 in costs after pleading guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

  • Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 states: “It shall be the duty of every employer to conduct his undertaking in such a way as to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that persons not in his employment who may be affected thereby are not thereby exposed to risks to their health or safety.”

 

Recycling giant fined £150k for worker’s death

A global metal recycling company has been fined £150k for safety failings after a worker was killed when part of a 33-tonne metal barge he was dismantling collapsed on top of him.

The employee sustained catastrophic crush injuries in the incident at European Metal Recycling Ltd’s  (EMR’s) Kingsbury depot in Warwickshire on 12 October 2011.

The recycling company was jointly sentenced after an investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) identified serious flaws with the method of work being used to dismantle the barges.

Warwickshire Crown Court heard that the worker was working alongside others to cut and dismantle two large steel barges using oxy-acetylene torches.

The worker had finished cutting through the outer skin of the barge’s hull and had moved inside the now unsupported structure to cut some supporting braces when the side collapsed in on him. The married father of two died at the scene.

EMR failed to do enough to protect the workers, and ensure that burning contractors were competent and working safely.

European Metal Recycling Ltd was fined £150,000 and ordered to pay £80,000 in costs after pleading guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

  • Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 states: “It shall be the duty of every employer to conduct his undertaking in such a way as to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that persons not in his employment who may be affected thereby are not thereby exposed to risks to their health or safety.”

 
 
 
 
 
 
Kenny Wintle
e: kenny.wintle@watermangroup.com

Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Ltd
2nd Floor | Cubo | 38 Carver Street | Sheffield | S1 4FS | t: 0114 2298900
Pickfords Wharf | Clink St | London | SE1 9DG, t: 0207 928 7888

Waterman Greenspace takes the burden out of your Management Systems and the hard work from Compliance.

Waterman has taken all reasonable precautions to ensure that information contained in this bulletin is accurate, but stresses that the content is not intended to be comprehensive. Waterman recommends that no action be taken on matters covered in this bulletin without taking full professional advice. Waterman holds the copyright for the Legal Update which is sent to you on the basis that it should not be used or reproduced in any material or other medium produced by you or passed to any third parties without the prior consent of Waterman.
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
© 2025 Waterman Group plc
 
 
 


The contents of this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any views stated herein do not necessarily represent the view of the company and are those of the individual sender, except where it specifically states them to be the views of the Company.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mis-transmission. If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it and all copies and e-mail a notification to the sender. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may constitute a breach of confidence.


All reasonable precautions have been taken to see that no viruses are present in this e-mail. Waterman Group cannot accept liability for loss, disruption or damage however caused, arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments and recommend that you subject these to virus checking procedures prior to use.
E-mail messages may be monitored and by replying to this message the recipient gives their consent to such monitoring.